首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Have you any recollection of what occurred at all?’: Davis v. Colchester County Hospital and Medical Negligence in Interwar Canada
【2h】

‘Have you any recollection of what occurred at all?’: Davis v. Colchester County Hospital and Medical Negligence in Interwar Canada

机译:“你有没有记得发生过什么事?”科尔切斯特县医院和医疗疏忽在Interwar加拿大

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The history of medical malpractice in Canada has received little attention from legal or medical historians. Through a contextualized study of a Nova Scotia case from the 1930s, Davis v. Colchester County Hospital, this article demonstrates how changes in technology and surgical procedures both created situations that spurred malpractice claims, and made it difficult for injured patients to prove medical negligence. In addition, developments in tort law concerning the liability of hospitals, and the doctors and nurses working within them, provided medical defendants ample opportunity to avoid legal liability, even in cases in which the existence of negligent treatment was obvious. The testimony at trial, the legal strategies utilized by the lawyers, and the judicial rulings also shed light on attitudes of the medical profession toward personal responsibility and ethics, and demonstrates how the interests of patients were weighed against those of medical institutions and professionals by lawyers and judges.
机译:在加拿大,医疗事故的历史很少受到法律或医疗历史学家的关注。通过对1930年代戴维斯诉科尔切斯特县医院的新斯科舍省病例的情境研究,本文证明了技术和手术程序的变化如何既造成了引发医疗事故索赔的情况,又使受伤的患者难以证明医疗过失。此外,关于医院以及在医院内工作的医生和护士的侵权法的发展为医务被告提供了充分的机会避免法律责任,即使在明显存在过失治疗的情况下也是如此。审判中的证词,律师采用的法律策略以及司法裁决也阐明了医疗行业对个人责任和道德的态度,并表明律师如何权衡患者的利益与医疗机构和专业人员的利益和法官。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号